| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xterra wrote: | hmmmm....is it just me or does anyone else see the uncanny resemblance to Damansara Perdana's Metropolitant Sq facade....  |
can't remember if MetroSquare looks alike but must say that the vertical flat wall type with fresh color was 1st introduced in 2 hamsphire by Benetton.
SW also adopt similar fresh (or shall I say ZEST) colors. I must say that Zest and SW will be two dinstinctively modern looking condos in Puchong. Can't remember when Puchong has exciting and modern looking condos around. Think the last launch was IOI's Puri something, and the latest one was Herron, same developer as per Zest.
Beside exterior look, Zest also give you full glass balustrades (for condo of abt 200k) and full porcelain tiles. Even SW only gives you ceremic tiles and iron grilles for balcony. Also dedicated concealed aircond ledge. Landscaping by renowed company (see their profile in the web).
All in all, freehold, highway frontage....next to golf course.....a good catch  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
East facing
Block C, east facing – possible view
This pix was taken using hot air balloon, giving prospective buyers a glimpse of the likely view from East facing units. Presumably this is the view on 7th floor apartments, or 12 storey high. This pix was taken about 12mths ago, according to source.
South Facing
West Facing
North facing
Entrance to Apartments. Double width entrances.
Close-up on Shop lots
Close-up on retails podium.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pai Milan Doshi

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 2707
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this project seems decent with attractive pricing, but how solid is the developer?  _________________ Nothing in this life that is worth goin' for, comes easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brutus1 Renesial Leong

Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 1102
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pai wrote: | this project seems decent with attractive pricing, but how solid is the developer?  |
they have done Heron 8 mths ahead of schedule and accoding to them, hardly any defects. current project is the PT19. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brutus1 Renesial Leong

Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 1102
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fernando Alonso F1 Champ wrote: | | i like the 1119 sqf Zest layout best.................cheaper becoz its smaller BUT amazingly master bedroom can even do walk in wardrobe !!!.........dont think the others can..... |
yes, I was very surprised that they could come out with such design. it is indeed a very welcomed feature than the run-of-the-mill design where the MBR is just larger than other bedrooms!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brutus1 Renesial Leong

Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 1102
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| linustw wrote: |
West facing
|
the location of Giant Kinrara and the propsed LRT station is not "as close" as what the model suggest.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pai Milan Doshi

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 2707
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
hm, the thing is past performance doesnt always equate to future delivery
Think I'll skip this one for now, rookie developer and current downturn combo doesnt sound safe to me  _________________ Nothing in this life that is worth goin' for, comes easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brutus1 Renesial Leong

Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 1102
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pai wrote: | hm, the thing is past performance doesnt always equate to future delivery
|
so, are those developer with proven record is not spared of this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sunrain Milan Doshi

Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3671 Location: KL/PJ
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| brutus1 wrote: | | Pai wrote: | hm, the thing is past performance doesnt always equate to future delivery
|
so, are those developer with proven record is not spared of this? |
yes... it actually depends on how kiasu and kiamsiap they are...
when they go for the lowest tenderer, try to avoid that project...
everything that cannot go wrong might/will go wrong... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pai Milan Doshi

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 2707
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| brutus1 wrote: | | Pai wrote: | hm, the thing is past performance doesnt always equate to future delivery
|
so, are those developer with proven record is not spared of this? |
Not really, but at this trying times, I'll ask these questions :
1. How solid is this developer? Have they survived 97/98? how much cash reserve do they have?
2. Given the location and price, dont you think its "too good to be true"?
3. They have 700 units available, a better option to stay out for now, wait until its 60% or 70% complete and economy recovers, then only go in. Why take the risk now?
4. Lastly, when everybody else is selling a fish at min RM3, u have to wonder why a good fish seller has to sell their fish at RM2.
But, if u have balls of steel and 100% faith in this developer.........by all means buy a few units coz I think its a good deal.........too good perhaps to signal me the "red" flag....  _________________ Nothing in this life that is worth goin' for, comes easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not really, but at this trying times, I'll ask these questions :
1. How solid is this developer? Have they survived 97/98? how much cash reserve do they have?
Obviously not. This is the major obstacle for this company and this project.
2. Given the location and price, dont you think its "too good to be true"?
It only tells us that how much big developers like YTL, IOI and Setia have emassed from house buyers all these years. If new developer can develop and sell at 210/sqft, it's just a day light robbery for all these biggies to sell above 300/sqft.
This project does have two solid panel bankers behind, EON and UOB. Do you think the banks will blindly "back" them up if their proposal is not sound? Dun know how bankers work. can anyone enlight?
3. They have 700 units available, a better option to stay out for now, wait until its 60% or 70% complete and economy recovers, then only go in. Why take the risk now?
True. It's all about risk vs max. gain. If one were to buy "insurance", get in later. I don't know their strategy. Will their do the "UOA" thing by jack up prices by 30% on second block?
Also, was told that block A will be sold to overseas buyers at much higher price. Maybe they are thinking of making most of their money from this group?
4. Lastly, when everybody else is selling a fish at min RM3, u have to wonder why a good fish seller has to sell their fish at RM2.
New developers usually sell at lower price, because of reputation and also less money spent on publicity and social responsibility. Smaller developer also has lesser Head office expenses. I remember M18 also sell at "discount" 3 years ago.
But, if u have balls of steel and 100% faith in this developer.........by all means buy a few units coz I think its a good deal.........too good perhaps to signal me the "red" flag.... :scratch
Yes, agree that it's a steal deal......guess in this trying times, only developer that got balls will launch ambition products. Hmmm.....I admire their approach. They are not greedy. They could have waited 2 more years and then launch sometimes closed to SW prices.....dun know why they choose to launch now.....maybe there is lesser competition now, so good for newbie to get in....dun know......
I am still deciding if I should be greedy or fearful when everyone else is fearful.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brutus1 Renesial Leong

Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 1102
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pai wrote: | | 1. How solid is this developer? Have they survived 97/98? how much cash reserve do they have? |
they were obviously not around during that time.
| Pai wrote: | | 2. Given the location and price, dont you think its "too good to be true"? |
it is good but is it too good to be true?
| Pai wrote: | | 3. They have 700 units available, a better option to stay out for now, wait until its 60% or 70% complete and economy recovers, then only go in. Why take the risk now? |
both block A and B will not have KL view and as with all developers, prices will definitely increased. conservatively 10% per block launch, easily 20% difference.
| Pai wrote: | | 4. Lastly, when everybody else is selling a fish at min RM3, u have to wonder why a good fish seller has to sell their fish at RM2. | what if the fish was supposed to be sold at RM2?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pai Milan Doshi

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 2707
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guys,
Its your hard earned $$$, all Im saying is you should CAREFULLY consider the risk involved if you decided to buy :
1. surprisingly cheap product
2. from an unknown developer (certainly no bluechip)
3. short term MY economics doesnt look bright.
If you are tired from losing money to uncle Lim and looking for other means of "donations", pls go ahead.............  _________________ Nothing in this life that is worth goin' for, comes easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pai u are sifu in property, so your opinions are always highly appreciated and your bullet points do carry weight. BUT lets us look at these objectively:-
1. surprisingly cheap product
Actually it's not cheap. This project is VERY high densed....720units packed in 5.9acres = 122units/acres. Usual condo projects are ranging from 60 to 70. So the total gross income is still sizable for the developer. It's not as cheap as we preceived. Anyway @ 200/sqft, puchong address...I think it's very reasonable than speculatively expensive.
Your point 2 & 3 are spot on.....ultimately it's a fine line btw faith and gamble. But what in life is not about faith and gamble? from study, work to marriage? Best of all, the choice is on one's hand.
I stand up promoting this project as "good catch", but certainly need to monitor and gather more information on the developer's ability to complete this project at this trying time. If they can lock in sell, I believe they can build.
For this price, it's literally bread and butter dwelling for very average malaysians, and the demand will be there. Let's see  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KK Azizi Ali
Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 13 Location: KL
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| brutus1 wrote: |  |
This project looks quite interesting with reasonable price within my range if I stretch a little.
What I am not quite satisfied is the design/floor plan where all the units except the 2 corner (type A), where there is no open space for the kitchen or yard area. I mean the yard is looking out to internal walk ways and not open air. Hope you get what I mean. Will this design causes a lot of noise to the yard area? Also people may look into your yard area while walking towards their units, less privacy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silverlance Azizi Ali
Joined: 04 Jan 2009 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
However, type A near the Zest main entrance end yard is actually facing one of Block B's unit's 2nd bedroom..
Anyway, type B do have advantages of having an area in the front door where you can build a shoe cabinet as compared to type A. Also, type B has a small utility room which type A does not have.
Overall, both design has their pros and cons..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gks Milan Doshi
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 4466 Location: In KL Finally!
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Clever move by developer to place shoplots cover carparks as carparks is quite eyesore...
RM200psf not very expensive but definitely not cheap in Kinrara area... But given than the nearest competition with nearest concept is SetiaWalk (cheaper and of course inferior product than SetiaWalk), i guess that prospect buyers will bite this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gks Milan Doshi
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 4466 Location: In KL Finally!
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Type B come with open concept kitchen but with darkroom. Darkroom for me is a big no-no. Not only lack of natural light but most important is window is facing corridor and hence lack of privacy.
Type C also quite interesting as the only type with walk-in wardrobe.
My vote goes for Type A as no dark room, corner unit and price psf wise not much different with other type
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
more inferior than Setia Walk in terms of overall concept and dynamics, I agree.
more inferior than Setia Walk in terms of products quality and furnishing, I relunctantly disagree. As far as apartments are concerned, this ZEST matched SW all the way with better interior furnishing, better view option and better looking exterior and common area, with 40% cheaper...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gks wrote: |
My vote goes for Type A as no dark room, corner unit and price psf wise not much different with other type
 |
No absolute better units. Problem with Type A:-
1. more expensive, by at least 20k, same floor with Type C.
2. furthest walk away from lift
3. main door faces opposite unit
4. main bedroom door faces 2nd toilet
5. dining area faces two bedroom doors, lack of privacy
6. KLCC view might be compromise, if take units further away from highway |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gks Milan Doshi
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 4466 Location: In KL Finally!
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| linustw wrote: | more inferior than Setia Walk in terms of overall concept and dynamics, I agree.
more inferior than Setia Walk in terms of products quality and furnishing, I relunctantly disagree. As far as apartments are concerned, this ZEST matched SW all the way with better interior furnishing, better view option and better looking exterior and common area, with 40% cheaper...... |
Agree with these points....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brutus1 Renesial Leong

Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 1102
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No absolute better units. Problem with Type A:-
1. more expensive, by at least 20k, same floor with Type C.
it is also because it is the largest of all types
2. furthest walk away from lift
privacy and less noisy
3. main door faces opposite unit
very muhibbah, no?
4. main bedroom door faces 2nd toilet
agreed
5. dining area faces two bedroom doors, lack of privacy
individual preference but in terms of furniture arrangement, will be compromised a bit
6. KLCC view might be compromise, if take units further away from highway
agreed |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gks Milan Doshi
Joined: 31 Oct 2006 Posts: 4466 Location: In KL Finally!
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| linustw wrote: | | gks wrote: |
My vote goes for Type A as no dark room, corner unit and price psf wise not much different with other type
 |
No absolute better units. Problem with Type A:-
1. more expensive, by at least 20k, same floor with Type C.
2. furthest walk away from lift
3. main door faces opposite unit
4. main bedroom door faces 2nd toilet
5. dining area faces two bedroom doors, lack of privacy
6. KLCC view might be compromise, if take units further away from highway |
1. From pricing posted by you,
Facing swimming pool
type E - RM205 - 215psf
type B - RM202 - 215psf
type D - RM202 too 216psf
Facing KL view
type A - RM209 - RM220psf
type B - RM205 - 216psf
Type C - RM205 - 218psf
From above psf wise, not much different between all type of units. Type A slight expensive by RM5psf due to corner unit. Given the pricing above, i will vote for Type A.
2. Yes furthest away and in same time will have more privacy as other stayers not require to bypass your unit.
3. Since it's the last unit, hence not many ppl will bypass your unit. Also, most ppl will close the main door....
4. Agree. It's a disadvantage for type A
5. As this is a small sized unit, i thought the layout optimize the common living space... If you seen other layouts, there's narrow corridor leading towards all the room which are unusable and space wastage. For me, i think this is big advantage. As for privacy, just need to get use to close the bedroom door?
6. No idea as never been to the site before.
My 2 cents view....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cream Azizi Ali
Joined: 30 Nov 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As the lift is stick next to it type C MBR,
anyone know if the MBR will be noisy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linustw Ng Teng Fong
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7982
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cream wrote: | As the lift is stick next to it type C MBR,
anyone know if the MBR will be noisy? |
hahaha this was my queries as well......never stayed in a unit that close to the lift shaft, I also wanna know.
actually lift is next to the walk-in wardrobe in the MBR.
Cream, are you interested? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|